Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />TO: <br />DATE: <br />Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator H <br />April 17, 1998 <br />SUBJECT: #2340 Robert and Iris Waade, 3280/3290 North Shore Drive - Preliminar>' Plat <br />Review - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: LR-lC-1, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1/2 acre, Sewered <br />Total Site Area:1.503 acres <br />Proposal:Two-lot residential plat to create a single family lakeshore lot and a duple.x lot <br />near the road. The lakeshore lot is a back lot and subject to the pertinent standards. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Revised preliminary plat drawing (?) NOT RECEIVED AS OF 4-17 2:00 PM <br />B - Preliminar}' grading and drainage plan (?) NOT RECEIVED AS OF 4-17 2:00 PM <br />C - City Engineer Comments 3-19-98 <br />D - Resident Petition Submitted 3-16-98 <br />E - Notice of Planning Commission Action 3-17-98 <br />F - Staff concept sketch of PRD incorporating adjacent Dunn lot <br />G - Memo and Exhibits of 3-13-98 <br />New Information Since March 16 Meeting <br />Applicant submitted grading plans on March 12, too late for the City Engineer to review them prior <br />to the March 16 meeting. The City Engineer reviewed those plans on March 19 (See Exhibit C) and <br />his comments were forwarded to the applicant on April 2. Staff met with the applicant on April 2 <br />and discussed options including the possibility of doing a PRD rather than the proposed standard <br />plat; and how the plan might be revised if additional properties w ere added to the mix. <br />Applicant also noted he may choose to combine the lots and begin constructing a single residence <br />on the site this spring (if all 4 lots are combined the result will be a conforming building site) and <br />take his chances with a subdivision in the future. <br />Revised plans were e.xpected to be submitted today, Friday, April 17, but arc not in hand as of this <br />writing, and neither staff nor the City Engineer have had sufficient opportunity to react to them if <br />they are included in the packet.