Laserfiche WebLink
8.The granting of such variance will not merely serv'e as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The current residence cannot be altered without the granting of the variance. <br />Issues <br />1. <br />2. <br />The lot does not meet the lot area requirement. <br />The tennis court is non-conforming as it does not meet front and side setbacks and is located <br />nearer to the front lot line than the principal structure. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The existing residence could not be added to without a front setback variance. <br />The mature pine trees near the front lot line provide screening from Orchard Park Road. <br />The previous resolution stated that due to the interior layout of the west side of the residence, <br />it is necessar>' for the garage to be located 4' ahead of the front line of the existing residence <br />due to the impact upon internal access to the garage. This further encroachment will also <br />have a negligible visual impact. <br />6.The previous resolution e.xpressed concerns about the culvert under the driveway. The Public <br />Services Director has inspected the culvert and determined it adequate, although cleaning it <br />out would have a positive impact on drainage. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends approval of the renewal of a front setback variance to allow an attached three stall <br />garage and entryway addition that would be located 71.7' from the front lot line where 75.7’ is <br />existing and 100' is required. <br />U2360 Anthony* Kmetz <br />640 Orchard Park Road <br />Variance <br />April 20, 1998 <br />Page 5