My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
04-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:18 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:06:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship <br />The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the official controls. The property can continue to be used as a residence. However, the <br />deck is not in good condition and the applicant wishes to replace it. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br />land owner. The existing residence is located almost entirely in the area betw een the required <br />30' bluff setback and the top of the bluff. The zoning lot area does not have a suitable <br />building pad for any further additions <br />3.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance for <br />bluff setback will not change the character of the area. <br />The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance for any <br />use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where the affected <br />person's land is located. Deck replacement is consistent with the zoning district. <br />5.The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. Adjacent properties are also located along the <br />bluff. The subject lot is more restricted by the bluff and the existing road. <br />6.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Replacement of the deck will preserve an existing <br />property right. Adding a screened porch will enhance their property rights. <br />7.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants. But <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. No improvements can be made <br />to the property without a bluff setback variance. <br />Issues <br />1. <br />2. <br />This lot meets the setback requirements for street yard, side yard and lakeshore setback. <br />The topographical map and survey indicate that the existing residence is located over the area <br />defined by ordinance as the top of the bluff. <br />3. <br />4. <br />The applicant is proposing to replace an existing deck in poor condition <br />Minimal description of the slope and bluff would occur to replace the deck and to construct <br />a screened porch. <br />#2325 Lake Country Builders, John <& Cindy Olson <br />950 North Arm Drive <br />Date of PC, February 17,1 998 <br />page—3 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.