03-16-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zonin-' ^ #2329 January 13, 1998 Page 5 How the Proposed Development Relates to the Adjacent Residential Uses Development of duplexes on this site may place it somewhat out of context with the adjacent single family residential development, and from a long temi perspective might be considered as ultimately leading to a disjointed rather than comprehensive plan for the area between the marinas, unless the entire area is redeveloped with multiple family units. The total area between the marinas is approximately 3 acres, which if developed comprehensively could result in a 9 unit townhome complex with significant open space areas. The applicant notes that to-date, he is unable to acquire the remaining properties at prices that justify such a development. That is what is forcing the issue of creating two duplex buildings. Exhibit G-1 is a staff concept sketch of how* a comprehensive townhome complex might be developed. Exhibit G-2 is a staff concept sketch of how this area will look if the duplexes are constructed as proposed. Exhibit F-1 is staff's concept of how the current proposal should be revised to most closely meet all code requirements. Utilities The site is provided with (and limited by the locations of) municipal sewer lines. Since 3 residences previously existed on the property, it isunlikely that additional sewer connection charges will be required unless a total of 4 units is allowed, in which case staff will research whether charges are due. Applicant proposes to move an existing trunk sewer line, which the City Engineer has addressed in his comments. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission should review the proposal and address the following issues so the applicant will have some direetion how to proceed: 1. 2. Determine whether there is any justification to allow the large number of variances involved w'ith development of a duplex on the lakeshore lot. Determine whether there is any justification to grant access type/width standards for this project, increasing the number of homes sharing a private driveway from 4 to 8. 3. 4. Discuss the option of a PRD (See Exhibit F-3) and whether the 'underlying zoning district' should be considered as having a density of 2 units per acre or 3 units per acre. Advise applicant that the standard grading, drainage, and stormwater considerations apply to development of this site (See City Engineer's comments), that access will neeed to be approved by Hennepin County, that the property will be subject to park dedication fees, etc.