My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:13:49 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
File #2340 <br />February 3, 1998 <br />Page? <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />Is there any reason why applicant should not provide the normal grading and drainage plans? <br />Should a stormwater pond be required? <br />Does Planning Commission support the concept that the lot line abutting the private road <br />outlot, Outlot A, can be the front lot line, iherefo»‘e, making Lot 2 a conforming duplex lot? <br />Does Planning Commission concur that applicant should be responsible for constructing a <br />24' paved road the entire length of Outlot A, and granting easements over such road to all <br />property owners that will make use of it? Does Planning Commission agree that this should <br />be a private road, and not public? <br />Since the proposal for a duplex on Lot 2 appears to meet all the Conditional Use Permit <br />standards listed in the code, does Planning Commission have any additional concerns or wish <br />to place additional limitations on the use of Lot 2 for a duplex? <br />Does Planning Commission have any other concerns regarding access to this property or to <br />adjacent properties? <br />Does Planning Commission find any justification to grant special approval for lake access <br />for the proposed duplex units? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Although the proposed plan appears to meet most pertinent code standards, the lack of a grading and <br />drainage plan and it's potential effect on lot areas, makes it difficult to reach a conclusion on this <br />subdivision. Applicant was advised of the need for a grading/drainage/stormwater plan on February <br />3. Pending receipt of such a plan, staff recommends as follows: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Approval of the conceptual front lot, back lot layout. <br />Designation of the east line of Lot 2 abutting Outlot A, as Lot 2's front line, making its <br />frontage along North Shore Drive its side street lot line. <br />Applicant must provide a grading/drainage/stormwater plan prior to further Planning <br />Commission review. <br />4. Applicant's surveyor shall re-calculate hardcover zones based on corrected zone definitions.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.