My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:13:49 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 17, 1998 <br />(#7 - #2341 Daniel Anderson - Continued) <br />McMillan asked where the existing septic site is for the existing home. Gaffron said there <br />are two proposed septic sites. Anderson clarified that the existing septic has to be <br />removed as it is non-conforming. McMillan asked if any of the septic sites are more than <br />6% slope. Gaffron said all sites meet the 6% slope requirement. Additional testing for <br />possible trench systems will be conducted this spring. Trench drainfields would require <br />less land than the mound system sites that have been selected. Otto confirmed that there is <br />more than adequate room for all septic sites. <br />McMillan asked if Staff received comments from Hennepin County regarding Lots 6 and 7 <br />being adjacent to the park. Gaffron said he had discussed the issue with Del Miller, who <br />had no concerns. <br />Brad Bressler reported having gone on the walking tour v.'ith the Park Commissioners. <br />He said they determined that a 1 O' easement would not be sufficient with the grades found <br />on the west side and would require retaining walls. There are also power poles close to <br />the road that would have to be relocated. These reasons, along with the fact that an <br />easement already exists on the east side, resulted in Park Commission's determination that <br />the east side was the best location for a trail. Bressler identified the area determined to be <br />the best location for the trail to cross over to the west. <br />Bridget Hust, 820 Old Crystal Bay Road, noted that they hear cars driving down the road <br />since their home is so close to the road. With the speeding cars, Hust felt an intersection <br />would be required for crossover of the trail. She did not believe cars would be able to <br />stop in the location noted by Bressler if people are crossing the road. Hust said they were <br />not informed of the meeting when the Council decided the trail should be located on the <br />east side. <br />Another member of the audience indicated that it would be wise to resolve the trail <br />location soon. This gentleman felt it would '>e difficult to cross the road at the location <br />noted by Bressler as cars are traveling 40-50 mph. <br />Francis Graham emphasized the need to protect the trees on the subject property noting <br />the uniqueness of the woodlands. <br />Dan Anderson said he was willing to work out a trail easement for the west side. He <br />indicated that the 6% slope requirement for mound drainfields is not mandated by the <br />State and felt there were alternatives available. <br />Stoddard informed the public that the Commission will inform the police department of <br />the speeding problem on Old Crystal Bay Road. He indicated that a decision will not be <br />made at this time regarding the bike trail location.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.