My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:13:49 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 17, 1998 <br />(#7 - #2341 Daniel Anderson - Continued) <br />GafFron reviewed the issues for discussion, #1-8, as noted on pages 5 and 6 of the memo. <br />Surveyor, Ed Otto, responded to Gaffron's comments. He felt lots 2 and 3 were <br />fiinctional and adequately served by the cul-de-sac to allow for variance approval. Lot 2 <br />has frontage on Old Crystal Bay Road. Lot 7 is preferred to utilize the 50' wing as <br />planned in order to better control traffic. Otto said the road radius was designed to <br />protect the septic sites on Lot 1. He indicated that the area east of the house contains fill <br />and cannot be used for a septic site. <br />Otto said Dan Anderson and Marty Campion met with MCVVD representatives regarding <br />stormwater ponding and runoff. They conceptually approved a cash donation in lieu of <br />ponding due to the septic sites. With the site being sloped and containing a bluff impact <br />area, the MCWD would like to maintain that area for water treatment as the only <br />functional place for a pond is on the top of the hill. Otto said the City Engineer had <br />suggested the use of catch uasins. <br />Otto said only a minimal amount of grading would occur on Lot 6. He would adjust the <br />grading to eliminate any encroachment of the bluff impact zone. Otto noted that there is <br />dso room to pull the house back on Lot 5. <br />Stoddard asked if an average lakeshore setback variance is required. Gaffion said it <br />depends on what house is built first. He suggested defining house locations and approving <br />the average lakeshore setbacks now to avoid the need for future variances. Lindquist <br />agreed. Otto said the building pads are determined based to the septic sites. <br />Otto said he would be willing to grant a conservation easement to protect 6" or larger <br />trees on the bluff. Lindquist asked to see a vegetation plan. Anderson indicated there <br />were no trees on the building pad locations and only a few where the road is located. <br />Smith indicated her concern is what happens once people move into the homes. She <br />would like to see the land protected. Otto agreed. <br />During public comments, Duke Hust, 820 Old Crystal Bay Road, voiced concern wth the <br />bike trail. He noted the trail has to cross the road at some point. His home was built in <br />1909 and is only 52' from the road. A trail on Host's side of the road would severely <br />impact his property. Hust indicated that the Blair property to the north of his is closer yet <br />to the road. Hust felt the location for the trail crossing should be at Fox Street. <br />McMillan informed Hust that an easement has already been granted for the trail on the <br />east side of the road. Hust said the decision by Council differed from that recommended <br />by the Planning Commission at the time the easement was granted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.