Laserfiche WebLink
iMy'' T - <br />Re: Application for Variance In Setback at 1056* Lome ""dnda /fv^ <br />V <br />/.I Jd:m • <br />\ <br />A brief history: <br />We bought 1056 Loma Linda under the assumption its footprint had been approved <br />years ago. We discovered, when we brought in our plans, that the deck on the ground <br />level had never been approved. This Is why we are applying for any variances. Our <br />original plan did not exceed any of the original footprint. We had no intention of <br />seeking any variances. However the variances we do seek will greatly reduce the <br />present hardcover and will fall under previous approvals in 1977. There Is one small <br />exception, and it will add no hardcover that wouldn’t be added by the alternative. <br />The original plan approvals In 1977 did call for a 12x15’ deck off the main level of the <br />house with a stairway leading to the ground level. Beneath that deck we want to put in <br />a porch. We would also like to put in a 3 ’ x 15’ walkway on the lakeside of the porch <br />which gives us access to the yard. Otherwise we would have to extend the stairway a <br />significant amount to reach the yard because of the steepness of the slope at that <br />point. The hard cover required would be about the same either way. <br />We would also like to build a small 8'x6 ’ deck off the upper level over the main floor <br />deck where hardcover already exists. <br />We will tear up the ground level deck and will only replace that portion that is directly <br />under the main level deck plus the walkway that gives us access to the yard. We also <br />will take out the wooden walkway that is on the north side of the house and leads from <br />the main entryway to the lakeside lower deck. <br />This lot is a small lot, typical of this portion of the lake. The present hardcover in the <br />setback zone of 0-75’ is 568 S.r. With our proposed plan, we have reduced the <br />hardcover to 254 S.F. That takes us from 9.3% to 4.2%. 45 S.F. are the new walkway <br />which we would have If we have to extend the stainway. The rest of the hardcover is <br />previously approved hardcover in 1977. <br />In the 75-250' zone there is minimal change. The present hardcover is 3391 S.F. and <br />our proposal calls for a very slight reduction to 3370 S.F. This changes the <br />percentage from 55.4% to 55.0%. <br />Although we hate to lose the present deck which is in good repair(one of the few <br />things that are), we also want to make sure what we do have is built correctly, and can <br />be maintained or improved in the future. We do not want a future buyer of the property <br />to encounter the surprise we did. <br />K