Laserfiche WebLink
r#4» ^ "r- *-— —•------- <br />S <br />1 , <br />•* <br />.. •-.“ .• <br />.- V- <br />••fI • <br />V...* <br />‘> <br />V <br />\* <br />*-rVt;v.r5^^>rd <br />^S# <br />m-. <br />July 13, 1987 <br />CITY of <br />PmI OfficM Hot tttCnrMol Boy, Hiomoou 663Z3*Moaid9d OfBcw <br />On tht North Short of Lake Minnttonko <br />KBvIn R* k lIbb Touvb Olstn <br />4198 North Shore Drive <br />Mound, MN 55364 <br />Rei Zllegel Subdlvleion of Lote 55-56-57, <br />Tex Parcel P.I.D. 607-117-23 44 0047 <br />Dear Nr. i Hra. Oleeni <br />Highwood Z.ake Minnetonka <br />letter le Intended to clarify for you the City's position <br />regarding your purchase of Lota 55 and 56, Highwo<i Lake Minnetonka. <br />a Lot of Record per Section 10.03 Subdivision 6. <br />A deed dated December 30, 1986, appearing in City files as <br />Lota a^**w4**v ^^■■■^J^c*tion request, indicates you purchased only <br />uS ui^h Mlgh»/ood Uke Minnetonka. You have additionally provided <br />SI A riJlwii Abstracts indicating that Lot 55 was crigi.nally <br />covered uidir rIrl1#V‘I* **#• •”** inclusive were <br />tS^v. duSi«« NO. 269398. I believe that Mr. James <br />thAfc P^®^* dicussion on 7-7-07 was attempting to explain to me <br />those Certificates revised <br />o?.i Vi?l^ -If?? ?* «nd 56 on one Certificate of Title. If that is the case, tnat still has no bearing on the City's policy or ordinaricts. <br />h-i,-y®“ taxes on Lot 57, although you do not <br />dlnlrltlnf If™ -*?-}? • normal occurrence that the Hennepin County tax <br />rae«rd!I*”Vk«*}fAlM. •PP*^®''*^ ®*' aubdlvisions prior to reviaing tax <br />racftVdV the jCounty,request for changes to tax <br />be that’BO’furthe^ permits will <br />rlstle. until the matter la eettled. Thie position <br />-- -•*• *** the M r.e.liance that<your property Includes Lots <br />;^0l,of. 1 :aiire iaquired to bs <br />aoJii aa^ 'i *"? IfAvea a aubatandard lot of 0.63 dryLoti 51# SI# €0 inA CX inoluiivie . Iht City contidori 51 thiru 61