My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:04 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2339 <br />Februaty 13, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Should the portion of such a road be constructed by the applicant at this time? With or <br />without a temporar>’ cul-dc-sac? <br />Optionally, should this road be platted as public road and maintained by the City prior to <br />such future connection, or should it be platted as a privat^paioutlot, to be constructed now <br />but maintained as a private road by the current property owners until such time that the City <br />takes it over when the future connection is made? <br />If this is platted as a public road and the City maintains it, what is Planning Commission's <br />recommendation regarding parking restrictions or admitting access to local residents only, <br />given the proximity to the Maxwell Bay access? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />1.Platting of a dedicated roadway along the entire length of the south boundary should be <br />required. The dedicated roadway can be 42' in width if it is confirmed that the City has <br />roadway rights over the 8' adjacent easement. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The construction of a 28' paved roadway with a temporary' 80' diameter cul-de-sac located <br />approximately between Lots 1 and 2 is recommended, based on fire department needs and <br />code standards. Note that if this was being proposed as a 2-lot plat, the need to provide a <br />corridor for future through road would still exist, but code would not require the <br />establishment of a road and cul-de-sac at this time, since the threshold for full road status is <br />3 or more lots. <br />Staff recommends that this be maintained as public roadway by the City, but that ciue to the <br />unique circumstance of proximity to the Ma.xwell Bay access, limitations on parking and/or <br />general use by car trailer traffic be considered. <br />No variances should be granted for lot area, lot width, setbacks, or hardcover. If a temporary <br />cul-de-sac is required, it could be on an easement. Optionally, the hardcover associated with <br />the cul-de-sac would not count against the hardcover allotment for the respective lots. <br />The applicant should address all grading and drainage issues, and develop a plan for a water <br />quality pond on the site per the Engineer ’s recommendation. <br />6. The standard park dedication fee should be required. <br />7. The standard drainage and utility easements should be required,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.