My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:04 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2326 <br />January' 16, 1998 <br />Page 10 <br />G. <br />n. <br />I. <br />Loading berths. No loading berm on the site plan, and presumably are no intended. <br />Staff would note that retail uses, especially restaurant type uses, may involve daily <br />deliveries, and such uses that are franchises might involve fairly large delivery <br />vehicles. Applicant should define how deliveries will occur to the site, and for <br />instance, if they use the rear entrance, applicant should demonstrate that there is <br />sufficient width in that rear alley way to accommodate drive through traffic as well <br />as delivery traffic. <br />"Drive-in standards". Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subd. 19 discusses standards for <br />"drive-in establishments". It is unclear whether the intent of this section is to <br />regulate drive-in restaurants, or general drive through service uses. The requirements <br />include construction of a screening fence along "the lot line", presumably finding that <br />a drive-in use is not something one wants to look at. In the conte.xt of the proposed <br />bank drive through, staff would assume that the canopy and drive through facilities <br />will be commensurate in character with the building, and will not require any unusual <br />fencing or screening. <br />Landscape plan. The City’s landscape consultant, Wally Case of DSU, Inc., has been <br />requested to review the general layout of this site, including landscape plan. His <br />written comments will be available late in tlie week of January 20. It should be noted <br />that the site contains approximately 10-15 mature hardwoods at the north end of the <br />site, all of which will apparently be removed as part of tliis development. Applicant <br />should define whether there are any mature trees on the site that will be preserved. <br />It would appear that the scattered nature of those trees will make preser%ation <br />difficult. <br />Planning Commission should review the landscape plan and ultimately the comments <br />by Mr. Case, and conclude whether any revisions are appropriate. While the <br />landscape plan is fairly detailed. Case has suggested that much more landscaping is <br />needed to not only replace the trees being lost but to help in providing a transition to <br />the residential surroundings. Hardwood boulevard trees are proposed approximately <br />every 50'; more are likely needed, and unless significant changes are made to the <br />boulevard, the trees will be growing up from a sidewalk. The existing sidewalk along <br />Shadywood Road extends from the intersection of 15 and 19 northward to the north <br />boundary of this property. The total proposed depth from Shadywood Road curb to <br />parking lot curb is only 12', and if half that is taken up by sidewalk, applicant must <br />detail how boulevard landscaping will be established in the remainder. <br />Staff recommends that a much more thorough landscape plan be presented.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.