My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:04 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01/23-9S 15:08 0612 337 5601 DSU. INC.0004 006 <br />entrance location (for either a two-way or right-in-only access) needs to be reviewed <br />by a traffic engineer. If the southern access Is eliminated, the internal circulation to <br />accommodate the bank drive-up tellers and Culver connection would be through the <br />front parking bay. This may result In some parking and access conflicts. <br />4. Architectural Treatmer)t <br />The developer needs to provide elevations of ell building facades for City review. <br />The architectural treatment of any building on this site needs to reflect the <br />following. <br />The site is located at one of only three north/south crossing points in the Lake <br />Minnetonka area. The County Road 19/County Road 15 Intersection is the mainr <br />cross roads between the lower and upper Lake MinnetonltH arf»as . The architectural <br />treatment of the sits needs reflect the importance of this Intersection and to help <br />set the tone for the area. <br />In addition/ the architectural treatment of the site needs to reflect the transition <br />between the commercial uses and the adjacent residential uses. The architecture, <br />and landscaping must protect and enhance the identity and character of the <br />surrounding setting. <br />The building needs to incorporate and express suitable architectural Style, character, <br />scale, design detailing, materials, colors, and signing. <br />The architectural style and detailing needs to be of a higher quality. The scale and <br />massing of the proposed building needs to be more sympathetic to the surroundings. <br />The proposed building includes a large asphalt shingle roof that is a major visual part <br />of the building. This roof may need to be broken into more planes, reduced <br />somewhat In overall mass and height. The cupola Is a nice idea. The roof should <br />« also be constructed of a visually higher quality.material (IE. cedar shakes). Cedar <br />shingles are not listed as approved materials In the City code. However, the use of <br />high quality cedar shakes for roofs and siding Is in character with the lake area. The <br />Other proposed materials are generally suitable. All facades also need to <br />Incorporate, more and better detailing and fenestration. The porticos and entrances <br />are fairly large and flat (In the same plane as the fascia). The curved atgn panels are <br />overly repetitive and would be difficult to read. <br />*>. <br />5. Tr^sh Enclosuri» <br />The trash enclosure should be attached to building In an architecturally appropriate <br />manner at the northern end of the building. <br />6. Outdoor Seating Area <br />Outdoor spaces and seating areas need to incorporate appropriate design features, <br />scale, detailing, locations, landscaping, and lighting. <br />-3-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.