My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:04 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1998 <br />(#13 - #2319 Ron Lauer - Continued) <br />The house is about 3500 s.f. Schroeder felt the home could be made smaller. In that case, <br />Schmidt said they would prefer to move the driveway back into the hill, which to him <br />would not make sense. Lindquist informed Schmidt that the intent is to build new <br />construction without requiring any variances, which sometimes requires tree removal. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Hawn reported that while visiting the property there did not appear to be major trees <br />within 5-6' of any building area. She did not believe moving the house back would <br />interfere greatly. <br />Lauer presented another proposal for location of the house. Hawn inquired about the <br />hardcover amounts. Lauer said the 75-250' hardcover would be about 30% with parking <br />area being located behind the 250' setback line. Schmidt said the size of the patio and <br />sidewalk would be reduced. It would require cutting of 6-8 trees. <br />Schroeder reiterated that other homes in the area have been built without variances and <br />lots are not substantially different. <br />Gafffon inquired about the relationship this proposal would have to the hill and house <br />location. Lauer said a smaller home is located 56' from the lake to the south and the point <br />recedes back affecting the average lakeshore setback. <br />McMillan asked if 30% hardcover was possible in the 75-250' setback. Lauer said it was <br />possible. Schroeder asked about meeting the 25% requirement Lauer said it would <br />require pushing the home into the hill. Schroeder presented the possibility of decreasing <br />the size of the home noting he would like the hardcover to be at a maximum of 25%. <br />A member of the audience, who is a Realtor, felt the 30% hardcover requirement was <br />consistent with the neighborhood, felt the reduction from 40% to 30% shows an <br />improvement, and requiring less would be irresponsible of the Commission. Schroeder <br />objected to that comment. The Realtor said a 10% reduction would be enviable and did <br />not mean to criticize the Commissioners themselves. <br />Mr. Buxton said the 25% hardcover requirement could be met by pushing the home back <br />into the hillside. He reported that the hill is not large but has a woodland abutting it. <br />Buxton said the change would make the driveway entry awkward and remove some of the <br />value of the woodlands. He feels there needs to be enough room for parking during the <br />winter months. He felt there would be substantial changes to the proposal if the variance <br />was not allowed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.