Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1998(#1 - #2289 Jon Pendleton - Continued)There were no public comments.Smith confirmed that the horse would be housed elsewhere over the winter months. <br />Lindquist asked the applicant if he was satisfied with the staff recommendatmns. <br />Pendleton asked if pasture #2 would require fencing if only used as a secondary <br />LeLtive. LindquUt said it could be fenced if it is needed for use. Bressler indicated the <br />use of pasture #2 primarily to provide relief for vegetation growth in pasture # 1. <br />Pendleton said he would wait and see if pasture #2 would be used. <br />Hawn noted the letter referencing best management practices is not specific as to handling <br />of manure. Pendleton said he will speak with Mr. Geske regarding this issue and <br />comply with requirements. Smith said Pendleton would most likely be required to <br />compost the manure. Lindquist asked that clarification on this issue be resolved by time of <br />Council review on February 9. Hawn asked that the compost pile be located away from <br />any wetlands. Pendleton agreed noting the terrain is higher in the pasture area. <br />Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2289 per staff <br />recommendation with letter from Mr. Geske referencing proper program procedures. <br />Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#2) #2290 STEVEN AND ELAINE SILUS, 3225 CASCO CIRCLE - Conditional <br />use permit to grade within 5' of the south propertj line to allow a driveway and <br />retaining wail - 6:44-7:02 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The Applicants were present. <br />Van Zomeren distributed pictures of the construction site from last summer and current <br />pictures with the garage removed. She showed the plans and survey of the property with <br />elevations highlighted and including the landscaping plan. The driveway plan was <br />reviewed The driveway is located 2* from the property line with a retaimng wall and curb <br />to prevent runoff. Runoff will be directed into the south side yard. The dnveway had <br />previously been blacktopped and was shared with the neighboring property^ A drainage <br />swale with steel edging and rock mulch is proposed in the side yard. No fabnc <br />underlayment is proposed because it would increase hardcover. <br />Hawn asked about the height of the retaining wall. Silus said the \vall would be at a 3-1/2 <br />maximum height by the house and be lower closer to the street. The curb is 8 in height. <br />^ 'v