Laserfiche WebLink
Hardcover <br />Distance <br />from <br />Shoreline <br />0'-75' <br />75 ‘-250’ <br />Total Area in <br />Setback <br />11,185 s.f. <br />8,105 s.f. <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />1,519 s.f. <br />(13.6%) <br />♦1,553 s.f. <br />(13.9%) <br />2,701 s.f <br />(33.3%) <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />none <br />2,026.25 s.f <br />(25%) <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />1,836 s.f <br />(16.4%) <br />*1,870 s.f <br />(16.7%) <br />2,701 s.f <br />(33.3%) <br />Variance <br />Requested <br />1,836 s.f <br />(16.4%) <br />*1,870 s.f <br />(16.7%) <br />none <br />♦Hardcover calculations show the increase in hardcover if portions of the residence with an overhang <br />exceeding 3' are calculated as hardcover. City policy states that overhangs extending beyond 3' from <br />structures count as hardcover. While not reflected on the surv'ey, the elevation drawings show that <br />the entire existing deck is located under the overhang on the lake side of the residence. As existing, <br />the lot exceeds allowable hardcover amounts in the O' to 75' and 75' to 250' lakeshore setbacks. As <br />proposed, hardcover would be increased by 2.8% in the O' to 75' lakeshore setback. A hardcover <br />variance in the 75' to 250' lakeshore setback is not necessary as no construction is proposed in this <br />zone. <br />STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP <br />The applicants' statement of hardship is included as Attachment J. They should also be asked for <br />their testimony regarding this issue. <br />Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship <br />1.The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />The existing residence and deck were built prior to current zoning regulations. Any <br />proposed improvements. Any proposed improvements may require variances for <br />structural coverage and hardcover. <br />if2333 Lawrence Stolsather/Linda Sallee <br />3285 Carman Road <br />Idr lances <br />2/17/98 <br />Page 3 <br />1