My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:04 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r i <br />File #2341 <br />Februar>' 12, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br />2. Does Planning Commission accept the proposed method of access to Lot 7? <br />3. <br />4. <br />How does Planning Commission view the road radius issue, especially if making it conform <br />to the City standard will have an impact on septic sites? <br />t ,-V-^ ^ <br />(>A>Should llie trail easement be granted at this time?^an it be relocated around the potentially <br />impacted septic sites on Lots 2 and 7? If so, will this have an impact on the area calculation <br />for those lots? <br />5.Is there any reason applicant should not be required to provide stormwater ponding for this <br />development? <br />6.Is there any reason why the grading of the building pad on Lot 6 should be allowed to <br />encroach the bluff impact zone? <br />7.The bluff impact zone should be correctly depicted for Lot 5, although this will show to an <br />even greater extent how limited the building envelope is for this Lot. <br />8.Does Planning Commission have any specific guidelines to propose for a tree preservation <br />easement to be developed for the lakeshore lots? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval subject to the applicant addressing issues noted by the City Engineer <br />prior to presenting this proposal to Council for preliminary plat approval. If changes to the road <br />layout, grading plan or stormwater pond development will significantly change the lot layout, staff <br />would want to first bring this back to Planning Commission for further review. <br />2. <br />Any recommendation for approval should include or address the following: <br />1. Approval of lot width variances for Lots 2 & 3. <br />Acceptance of access method for Lot 7, including a requirement that all existing <br />accesses to the county road be eliminated. <br />Road radius issue. <br />Trail easement and location. <br />Stormwater ponding. <br />Bluff impact variances or adherence to standards for Lots 5 and 6. <br />Tree preservation easement. <br />Adherence to normal development requirements, including perimeter drainage and <br />utility easements, private road easements and covenants, developers agreement, park <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.