My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:16:23 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:04:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2322 <br />January 14, 1998 <br />Page 4 <br />3.Has applicant provided sufficient information to allow Planning Commission to conclude <br />that a vegetative barrier will in fact be established, or should some specific vegetation plan <br />be submitted with plant species, locations, and a professional nurseryman ’s estimate of the <br />estimated duration needed to establish a suitable barrier? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />If Planning Commission determines that the hardships presented by applicant justify the granting <br />of a variance on either a permanent or temporary basis, then a recommendation for approval would <br />be appropriate. Any recommendation for a temporary variance should include the following <br />conditions of approval: <br />1. Applicant to provide a landscaping/screening plan defining the vegetation types, locations, <br />and tjvJmated time frame for establishment of a vegetative screen that will replace the fence. <br />2. <br />3. <br />The approval resolution should include language requiring the fence be brought into <br />conformity by a date certain. Conformity may mean one of the following: <br />A. Complete removal. <br />B. Reducing its overall height to 3 Vi'. <br />C. Relocating it to a location at least 50' from the northerly lot line. <br />Advise applicant of his obligation to meet any standards established by other government <br />agencies which have jurisdiction over the non-City protected wetland. <br />Options for Action <br />1. Recommend approval of a permanent variance, defining the hardships. <br />2. .Recommend approval for a temporary variance, defining the hardships and specifying <br />conditions under which the fence can be temporarily approved. <br />3.Table for further information. <br />4. Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br />5.Other.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.