My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:16:23 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:04:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2322 <br />January 14,1998 <br />Page 2 <br />of that convolution, hence the answer provided was that a 6' fence is allowed. In fall 1997 staff was <br />advised by a Councilmember that it appeared a privacy fence was going to be constructed along <br />Watertown Road, and when this was investigated a 6' fence was in place. The property owner was <br />notified of the 3 'A' limit and the potential issues regarding the Type 1 non-City protected wetland <br />status of that part of his property. Applicant appeared before Council on November 10 requesting <br />relief, and was advised to make a formal application for a variance, or perhaps a "temporary" <br />variance. Applicant's intent is to maintain the 6' screening fence until a vegetative screen can be <br />established that will provide a barrier to the headlights from traffic leaving Trufflila Trail, which <br />exits directly north of the property onto Watertown Road. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Please review applicant's letter of request, which indicates concerns about the noise and headlight <br />glare from Watertown Road and Truffula Trail. In staffs opinion traffic noise is a relatively minor <br />issue, being no different for this property than dozens (if not hundreds) of other properties in Orono <br />which abut a collector road. However, the headlight impact from Truffula Trail is somewhat unique <br />to this property given the house location and elevation, as well as the location and elevation of <br />Truffula Trail. <br />In relation to the specific criteria for determining undue hardship: <br />1. <br />2. <br />The property in question cannot be put to reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the official controls. <br />The property is being put to a reasonable use because it contains a single family residence. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br />landowner. <br />The relationship between applicant's property and the orientation o/Truffula Trail is unique <br />to applicant's property, because headlights from traffic exiting Truffula Trail aim directly <br />at applicant's residence, and his rear yard is relatively open and not vegetated at this time. <br />3. The variance if granted will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The City has maintained a character of open spaces, not hemmed in by privacy fences, along <br />collector roads. Very few similar fences can be found within the rural area. A 6'fence at <br />the intended location alters the essential character of the locality, is not in keeping with the <br />normal practice within Orono's rural area, and is not appropriate on a permanent basis in <br />staffs opinion.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.