01-20-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ifd CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF NO. __ CITY COUNCILTHE CITYas 0 6 There is no additional land available to expand the lot width of the property. No other variances are required as a result of this improvement. E.The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent property owners notified of the variance application. 4.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit construction of a new residence on a property that does not meet the required lot width and grants a variance of 65.1' or 46.5% to Robert E. and Wendy K. Beutler of 1331 North Arm Drive, subject to the followng conditions: 1.Prior to the City issuing a Certificate of Occupancy for the new principal structure, applicants' contractor sha!! be responsible for removing all heating and plumbing facilities within former residence structure to be converted to an accessory structure. Page 2 of 5 I