Laserfiche WebLink
Staff recommends approval of a lakeshore setback variance of 25' to allovv the residence <br />to be located 54.5' fr^m the OWHL where 75' is required and 35' is proposed. The 50' is <br />the DNR required lakb^ore setback. The 54'5 setback results from staffs proposed <br />footprint for the residen^^using ma.ximum structural coverage and being places as far <br />away from the lakeshore as possible. <br />Staff recommends approval of a rear setback variance of 18' to allow the residence to be <br />located 12' from the street where 30' is required. The distance from the nearest portion of <br />the garage to the street right of way following the driveway is 18'. The distance would <br />allow for a vehicle to piu’k in the driveway. (vM <br />Staff recommends approval of a hardcover variance in the O' to 75' lakeshore setback of <br />17% where none is allowed and 28.09% is proposed. This could be accomplished by <br />eliminating all decks and reducing the size of the residence in this setback to 756 s.f. <br />Staff recommends approval of a hardcover variance in the 75' to 250' lakeshore setback of <br />13.39% to allow 38.39% hardcover where 25% is allowed and 35.4% is proposed. The <br />driveway as proposed does not appear feasible as adequate space for vehicles backing out <br />of the second garage stall is not allowed. This need justifies the additional hardcover. <br />Having more of the residence in this setback also raises the hardcover amount. The <br />deletion of a portion of the driveway would offset a polion of these increases. <br />Attachment F2 depicts these modifications as proposed by staff. <br />Staff recommends denial of a structura' coverage variance of 303 s.f. to allow 1,803 s.f. <br />of structure w here 1,500 s.f. is allowed. The 1,500 s.f. requirement can be met by <br />eliminating the 117 s.f. second story deck, as well as reducing the size of the house by <br />186 s.f. <br />Staff recommends denial of the lakeshore setback variance of 37' to allow the fence to be <br />located 38' from the OHWL where fences are not allowed ahead of the 75' setback. The <br />applicant's concern of screening providing from neighboring residences could be <br />addressed through the planting of shrubbery*. <br />Staff recommends the applicant be directed to reduce the overhangs to not encroach more <br />than 1.5' from the structure as any overhangs e.xceeding 1.5' add to the amount of <br />structural coverage. While the elevation drawings reflect these overhangs, the survey and <br />hardcover worksheets do not. <br />U2296 Robert Bredeson <br />i39S Rest Point Road <br />Vanances <br />1/20/98 <br />Page%