Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />June 26, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 11 <br /> <br />have been a lot of half-truths, innuendo and no truths. For example, when it came to a fire chief, he said, <br />the City did not take James Van Eyll. It accepted applications and had great candidates. Van Eyll had a <br />leg up because he has all the information and the Council had a lot of respect for him, Walsh said, and <br />even he said he know the future of fire goes through Orono. He said the City did not take the ladder truck. <br />It was only after Orono decided to buy it that Long Lake decided to re-create history and say they had <br />wanted it, according to Walsh. He said Minnetonka Beach did not leave the Mound Fire Department <br />because of service but because of costs because they could get service for half the price. Walsh also <br />disputed the idea that Orono is taking Long Lake firefighters or their pension money. Any of them are <br />welcome to apply and the City just wanted to give them an opportunity, if they do join Orono, to keep <br />their pensions whole, he said. The one member of the Long Lake City Council who has attempted to keep <br />the lines of communication open with Orono has been called a traitor, he said. Orono provides police <br />service and public works for a number of cities and backs up other cities for other functions like water <br />and sewer, he said. He also questioned why Long Lake had to hire a public relations company, asking if <br />they were trying to put lipstick on a pig. He contended Long Lake has not been forthcoming with its <br />residents on several topics. <br /> <br />9. CLOSED SESSION <br />Walsh moved, Veach seconded, to enter into closed session as permitted by the attorney-client <br />privilege (section 13D.05, subdivision 3 (b)) to discuss litigation strategy regarding the City of Long <br />Lake vs. City of Orono. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(After a five-minute recess, the City Council was in closed session from 7:47 p.m. to 8:09 p.m.) <br />Walsh moved, Crosby seconded, to reopen the Orono City Council meeting at 8:09 p.m. VOTE: <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />The City Council continued to discuss the three documents that had been prepared by Councilmember <br />Benson and distributed toward the end of the meeting. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if the handouts that were given by Benson had been part of the packet. <br /> <br />Benson said they were not because it was not an agenda item. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned if it is permissible for Council Members to hand out materials to the Council and be <br />placed on chairs for the public to pick up. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick said there is nothing to prohibit Council Members from handing out materials. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if such materials could have a disclaimer stating they were the opinion of one Council <br />Member because he felt there were many inaccuracies. <br /> <br />Edwards said something could be added that it was distributed by Councilmember Benson. <br /> <br />Benson said she would have liked to have made her presentation an agenda item but doesn’t have that <br />power and was not permitted to show the documents at an earlier meeting. <br />