My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
07-24-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2023 2:19:49 PM
Creation date
7/25/2023 2:17:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From:Carol Price <br />To:Melanie Curtis <br />Cc:CHARLES PRICE <br />Subject:2815 Casco Variance Requests: Comments for Council Mtg on 24July2023 <br />Date:Monday, July 24, 2023 7:19:13 AM <br />Hello Melanie, <br /> <br />My review of the eight attachments to your email July 18, 2023 leads to the following <br />comments: <br /> <br />I don’t believe it is acceptable for this property to be granted a lakeside bluff variance <br />to add a deck and a shed/boathouse on the bluff when this is not in any way an “in- <br />kind” replacement of the previous retaining walls. Since little or no attention was paid <br />to replacing the damaged walls as they existed before the start of construction, these <br />new additions should be treated as new construction on the bluff, not as “in-kind” <br />replacement. <br /> <br /> Attachment # 1: Shown on this survey: Drain rim: 959.8. Also shown is an elevation <br />of 958 between the drain and the wall system and lake, which of course means no <br />water will enter the drain. Proper grading will be required in this area to ensure the <br />surface water pickup will catch all the surface water in this area. <br /> <br /> Attachment #3: Sheet 2. Gates Designs has indicated that the west end of the wall <br />(left in this drawing) is 957.4, which is far too low to support the earth in this area <br />which is 963 feet. It makes no sense that the highest elevation above this wall is <br />being left unsupported by over 5 feet. This Gates Design drawing is not signed by a <br />licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota. <br /> <br /> Attachment #3. Gates Designs proposal to add a concrete slab and poured footings <br />with a boathouse and deck above does not contain a licensed engineer’s sign-off. <br />The original engineered design of the wall system did not include this boathouse and <br />deck, and therefore the loads created by this new structure have not been considered <br />in the engineer’s plan. <br /> <br /> Attachment #4: A drain is shown on the east side of the wall structure, but there is <br />no drain shown for the west side. Both sides have outlets for drainage from the <br />bottoms of the retaining walls which MUST BE CONNECTED to pipes that will lower <br />this water to the lake. Without lowering this water in a pipe, the soil on the back of the <br />walls would get washed out by rainwater. <br /> <br /> Attachment #8: The words in Paragraph 8 read “every third course”, but the drawing <br />shows header and deadmen every fourth course. Which is it? <br /> <br />Regarding the hard cover calculations, have the latest version of the hard cover <br />calculations been critically evaluated by city planners? Especially considering things <br />like the deck, shed, and landings on the bluff, A/C pads, window wells, and the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.