My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
09-28-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 9:58:44 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 11:31:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 26 of 39 <br /> <br />11. #15-3772 ROBERT MILLER, 60 SMITH AVENUE, VARIANCES – RESOLULTION NO. <br />6539 (continued) <br /> <br />Bonnett indicated it would be. <br /> <br />Walsh noted in addition to the side setback, there would be some hedges and the garage that would help <br />mitigate that. <br /> <br />Bonnett stated the hedges are near the end of their life and that the pine tree is dying. Bonnett stated he is <br />not sure how the architect can say there is adequate screening. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it is difficult to screen a second story. <br /> <br />Bonnett stated he agrees with that but that they are looking for some type of screening. <br /> <br />Levang stated the lilac bushes will probably not provide much screening. <br /> <br />Bonnett stated it is his understanding the garage will be in the area of the lilacs. Bonnett stated they are <br />basically looking for a little less massing on the property. <br /> <br />Levang commented it would look different if the home was in the middle of the lot but it is off more to <br />one side of the property. <br /> <br />McMillan noted a number of these homes existed prior to the 2-acre zoning and that the Bonnett’s lot is <br />close to two acres but their home is close to the side setback. <br /> <br />Bonnett stated it was the City’s hope that these lots would be combined but they weren’t and now larger <br />homes are being built on the lots. <br /> <br />Ryan Blackwell, 80 Smith Avenue, stated their concern with the proposed project is the height for both <br />the main structure and the garage. The structure will be quite large given the actual useable space on the <br />property. Blackwell stated as far as the side setbacks are concerned, there will be 18 feet on the Bonnett <br />side and 10 or 11 on his side. Blackwell stated in his view it is excessive to increase the size by 10 feet <br />on a house that already has a second floor over a portion of the house and that he would ask the Council <br />to consider the side impacts on both neighbors. <br /> <br />Blackwell stated in his view he is less impacted than the Bonnett’s since they are on the garage side of the <br />expansion but that the proposed garage height will be 21 feet. Blackwell stated he would request that any <br />vegetation that is damaged or removed be replaced with something similar. <br /> <br />Blackwell noted the street is a dead-end and fairly narrow and that during the construction process he <br />would ask for consideration about parking on the street and allowing cars to pass. <br /> <br />Rob Miller, Applicant, stated as it relates to the size of the home, they are working within essentially the <br />same footprint of the house and that the house will be no wider than what exists now. It will still be 40 <br />feet wide and the only piece that is coming out is the component in the front. In addition, the footprint on <br />the main level is just over 1,100 square feet and the second story will bring it up to 2,250 square feet.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.