My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
09-28-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 9:58:44 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 11:31:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 22 of 39 <br /> <br />10. #15-3771 JULIE LENSING, 3349 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, VARIANCE – RESOLUTION <br />NO. 6538 (continued) <br /> <br />The Planning Commission at its August meeting held a public hearing and voted 6 to 0 to recommend <br />approval of the application with the following condition: <br /> <br />1. Submit revised hardcover calculations shall be submitted to properly report the hardcover existing <br /> within the 75-foot setback and the lot area. Revised calculations have been submitted by the <br /> applicant. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as requested. A draft approval resolution has been <br />provided for Council’s consideration. The Council should hold a public hearing tonight and consider <br />adopting or amending the resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan opened the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan closed the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. <br />McMillan noted Staff’s report states that the City’s definition of half-story changed since the original <br />resolution. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the City’s definitions regarding half story and basement has changed over time and that she <br />is not sure what exactly was in place at the time. Curtis stated what is on the property currently is not <br />conforming. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there was a half-story definition at that time. <br /> <br />Curtis stated to her knowledge it was more of a definition for a basement and that this is intended to be a <br />two-story home with a tuck-under garage. Curtis stated she is aware the regulations have changed over <br />time but that she does not know exactly what was in place at the time of the original resolution. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated she did visit the property but that she did not go behind the house and that she is not <br />sure whether there are windows back there. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the amount of exposure around the foundation for the lowest level is what it comes down to <br />and that the back portion of the house near the property line is in the ground but the other two sides and <br />front are more exposed. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether there are any bedrooms on the lower level. <br />Curtis stated the applicant would need to speak to that. <br /> <br />Levang stated from the back it appears to be a 3-story house. <br /> <br />Julie Lensing, Applicant, stated from the back, it does appear to be three stories and there is one large <br />window on the lower level. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.