My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
09-28-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 9:58:44 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 11:31:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 17 of 39 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING (continued) <br /> <br />Barnhart stated he is probably referring to the public hearing notice on the specific application that has <br />been submitted and that the number of dogs would be based on the amount of parking and size of the <br />building. <br /> <br />Meyers stated the property is in a commercial district but it abuts a residential neighborhood. Meyers <br />asked if the 80 is a general number for approval or whether that is what is being requested. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the application tonight is a text amendment and that there is an application in process that <br />will be reviewed by the Planning Commission that indicated there could potentially be up to 80 dogs in <br />this location. The applicants would also anticipate some outdoor activity. Barnhart stated the 80 number <br />is independent of this request. <br />Meyers stated the outdoor portion is in the back of the building which would face the neighborhood. <br />Meyers indicated there is a dog that lives there that barks every time another dog walks by and that he can <br />imagine the amount of barking that will occur if there are dogs outside the building on Shoreline. <br /> <br />Meyers stated he has been to dog kennels before and that it can be done, but in his view it would be good <br />to look at the Odogo facility, which is located in a commercial district. Meyers stated in his view 80 dogs <br />in this particular building would be a lot. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if it in a warehouse district. <br /> <br />Meyers indicated they have a facility off of Baker Road and are constructing another one near Ridgedale <br />but neither one is close to a residential area. <br /> <br />Walsh stated children’s daycare is very specific and that in his view the City can get a little more specific <br />on the definition of dog boarding and dog daycare. Walsh stated Staff may need to refine the definitions <br />further. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated he does not disagree with those comments but that he is not sure if those specifics should <br />be included within the definitions. <br /> <br />Walsh stated if it was known what amount of land would be required outside of the building, they could <br />lay out the requirements better. <br /> <br />Meyers stated if the outdoor area is on the east side, it would be more toward the residential area, and on <br />the west side it would be toward the commercial area. Meyers stated the City should look at this <br />application carefully and perhaps see whether there have been complaints with similar businesses in other <br />cities. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan closed the public hearing at 8:33 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.