Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />IN COURT OF APPEALS <br />A12-1419 <br />Peter H. Lanpher, et al., <br />Respondents, <br />vs. <br />Jay T. Nygard, <br />Appellant, <br />Kendall M. Nygard, <br />Defendant. <br />Filed April 22, 2013 <br />Affirmed <br />Hooten,Judge <br />Hennepin County District Court <br />File No. 27-CV-11-25386 <br />Mark A. Lund, James A. Heuer, Jr., Heuer, Lund & Flores, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />(for respondents) <br />Jay T. Nygard, Orono, Minnesota (pro se appellant) <br />Considered and decided by Hooten, Presiding Judge;Cleary, Judge; and Smith, <br />Judge. <br />S Y L L A B U S <br />The partition fence statute, Minn. Stat. §§ 344.01–.20 (2012), does not provide a <br />unilateral right to repair a fence located at or near a property line unless the fence is a <br />“partition fence” as defined under the statute and the procedural requirements of the <br />statute have been satisfied.