Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA23-000033 <br />17 July 2023 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed variance is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The property <br />includes difficulties in its topography and the orientation of adjacent homes. The average <br />lakeshore setback variance will not further impact views of the lake for adjacent <br />properties. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance to <br />construct a deck on this property is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The request to permit the deck and stair in the <br />proposed location partially within the average lakeshore setback appears to be <br />reasonable considering the orientation of the neighboring homes with respect to <br />the lakeshore the existing vegetative screening, the topography, and adjacent <br />properties. The request is reasonable. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The <br />current owners did not build the home. The linear nature of the shoreline <br />resulting in neighboring home locations all in a continuous line prevent changes or <br />expansions of the home on the lake side. The circumstances are unique to the <br />property; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance is <br />requested in order to permit construction of the lakeside deck to which will not <br />adversely impact the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted <br />information. <br />Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as residential improvements are an allowed use <br />in the LR -113 District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as <br />a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The home location and design does not permit <br />construction of a functional deck depth or allow for an access to grade. The home <br />location, the property's topography and orientation with respect to the lakeshore and the <br />adjacent homes create difficulties for the Owners in improving the property consistent <br />with the homes in their neighborhood on the lake side. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the <br />land is located. The linear shoreline and generally linear placement of neighboring homes <br />applies to the other homes in the immediate neighborhood. <br />