My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-10-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 9:24:10 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 10:59:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
463
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 27, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />__________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 22 of 29 <br /> <br />13. NORTHERN UTILITIES BUILD OUT – RESOLUTION NO. 6530 (continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated one of the things the Council should consider is the fact that the City is proposed <br />to front the costs. Mattick stated there are times when communities do not agree to be the bank <br />and then there is a reimbursement agreement of some type entered into. <br /> <br />Walsh noted the City could be the bank for a long time on the middle property. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if the property to the north of the Eisenger property would be a candidate for <br />utilities. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated that property is not in the MUSA. The Eisenger property requested to be <br />included in the MUSA just prior to the last Comprehensive Plan update being finalized. Gaffron <br />stated across the road there is the potential for some two-acre lots but at the time of the last <br />Comprehensive Plan update, the City had no desire to include that in the MUSA. <br /> <br />Levang noted the City would likely be required to have higher density in that area if it was <br />included in the MUSA system. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it would likely be three units per acre. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6530, a Resolution <br />Outlining the Funding Mechanism and Cost Distribution Plan for the Provision of Sanitary <br />Sewer and Municipal Water Utilities along CSAH 112 from Old Crystal Bay Road to <br />CSAH 6. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONTINUED <br /> <br />Edwards reported the paving has been completed on Watertown and Stubbs Bay Roads and that <br />the pavement marking should be completed later this week. Edwards stated overall it has been a <br />successful project but that there are a few punch list items remaining. <br /> <br />The Public Works Department has also performed some more patching of potholes. The debris <br />site was reopened on McCulley Road following the storm. Edwards indicated he has had some <br />people request longer hours following a storm. <br /> <br />Edwards stated the water plant project upgrades are proceeding well. The only major item <br />remaining on that project is painting, which will be finished by September. The Public Works <br />Department is also continuing with sewer clean-out in the areas marked with the gray on the <br />overhead. The green represents what has been completed to date. <br /> <br />Edwards reported concrete pads have been installed at Lurton Park and Crystal Bay Park for the <br />new picnic tables. Prairie Restorations has performed a control burn at Lurton Park. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.