My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-10-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 9:24:10 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 10:59:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
463
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 27, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />__________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 20 of 29 <br /> <br />. <br />13. NORTHERN UTILITIES BUILD OUT – RESOLUTION NO. 6530 (continued) <br /> <br />Edwards stated developers have begun to show interest in developing properties along the <br />western portion of CSAH 112. The area is divided into three parcels with developers actively <br />interested in the two end parcels. There are currently no known plans to develop the center <br />parcel, which is Dumas Orchards. The Community Management Plan calls for these areas to be <br />serviced with municipal water and sanitary sewer. Currently water and sewer service only <br />extends westward to the corner of Old Crystal Bay Road and CSAH 112. <br />In order to distribute the cost of the projects to the benefitting properties in an equitable manner, <br />the City will divide up the projects and allocate specific portions of the project to the benefitting <br />property. The cost will be further allocated based on the potential demand of the benefitting <br />properties by using the maximum number of units of each development area could accommodate <br />based on the current CMP land use guide plan. Edwards stated the City will be funding the <br />projects initially and then charge the developers for their portion as each development occurs. <br /> <br />Edwards stated the estimated costs of the projects are broken out in Staff’s report and that it <br />amounts to approximately $1.4 million worth of work in today’s dollars. Edwards stated there <br />are developers actively looking at developing two of the properties currently and that this would <br />give Staff a mechanism for providing the developers with the anticipated costs for the build-out <br />of water and sewer utilities. <br /> <br />Mattick noted this is an estimate and would be bid dependent. Mattick stated in his view this is a <br />preliminary look at the City’s formula for how the expenses are allocated. Mattick stated it is <br />important for the developers to understand that these costs would be borne by the development <br />or property owner. <br /> <br />Walsh stated this will help the developers know the estimated costs up front. Walsh asked what <br />the City’s fund capabilities are to fund this all the way down to the Eisenger property. <br /> <br />Olson stated the City has already funded the new well portion and that the City should have the <br />funding capabilities available for the rest. <br /> <br />Printup asked how the City arrives at the maximum number of units. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the Comprehensive Plan guides the James property and Dumas property for seven <br />to ten units per acre based on the dry buildable acreage and 10 to 15 units for the Eisenger <br />property. <br /> <br />Printup asked what would happen if it takes a long time for those properties to be built and if the <br />density is much higher. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.