My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
07-27-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 10:59:00 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 10:51:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
469
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 8 of 28 <br /> <br />wanted to buffer those from the northern boundary and that a 75-foot buffer was created along with <br />50-foot side setbacks and a 90-foot tree preservation area. Stickney noted a new septic location was <br />found resulting in zero tree loss for Lot 2, Block 2 and the pond was relocated on the other side of that <br />property. <br /> <br />Stickney indicated he has met with Prairie Restorations on the site a couple of times on the site and that <br />they will be planting prairie grasses on the north side of Lot 1, Block 3. A total of 1.96 acres will be <br />planted in prairie this year. Stickney stated he would like to spray the invasive species next week once his <br />plan is approved. Stickney stated as a result of the work of Prairie Restorations, the invasive species will <br />be eliminated, the woods will be cleaned up, the prairies will be burned, reseeded and restored, and the <br />ponds will be restored. <br /> <br />Stickney indicated Staff wanted to see what could be done about relocating the cul-de-sac near the woods. <br />The cul-de-sac has been relocated just south of the woods at the bottom of a slope. The result is less <br />impact in terms of tree loss. Stickney noted it would be a 20-foot wide road at a 12 percent slope. <br />Stickney stated on either plan the first 850 feet of the property would consist of a 20-foot wide road, <br />which is 10 times better than Fox Street. There are a total of 3.5 to 5.5 inches of asphalt in some places <br />and that they would increase that to around a foot of aggregate. Stickney stated they would like to keep <br />the 20-foot width. <br /> <br />Stickney stated on his plan, all the driveways, the septic sites, and the home sites are showing a minimal <br />loss of trees. Stickney indicated he will also be planting additional trees for screening and the roadways <br />will be lined with trees. Stickney stated the plan is that the lots will be camouflaged and to locate the <br />septic sites and driveways in places that will help ensure there will be a zero loss of trees. Stickney stated <br />preservation of the trees is one of the major concepts of this development and that there is a very strict <br />tree preservation and replacement covenant to further help preserve the trees. Stickney noted the <br />covenants will dictate where the building pads and driveways will be. <br /> <br />Diagram 5 depicts the plan that was presented at the June Planning Commission meeting. Stickney <br />indicated he removed one lot from the Big Woods area and placed it closer to the prairie. Stickney <br />illustrated the location of Lots 1 through 8. The newly relocated lot consists of almost four acres and a <br />number of trees will be planted on the lot. Stickney stated the only difference between this plan and the <br />other plan is that there will be one less lot in the woods, 36 more trees planted, and one lot in the prairie. <br />Stickney indicated he will also be planting approximately 40 trees in that area and will plant more if <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Stickney stated everything was planned initially to minimize someone’s ability to see the houses by <br />keeping what is there and adding trees. <br /> <br />Stickney stated Plan B has the cul-de-sac located further to the south and results in very little tree loss. <br />Stickney stated in his view the proposed location of the cul-de-sac in the first plan was probably the best <br />location for it but that he has relocated it to address the concerns of the Planning Commission. In <br />addition, the curb and gutter will result in very little grading. Stickney stated they have also designated <br />the primary and alternate septic sites and that the lots have similar building envelopes. <br /> <br />Stickney stated the covenants on this development say that an outbuilding can only be added if there is <br />zero tree loss. Further restrictions were placed in the covenants to require 100 percent of the homeowners <br />approve anything that would change anything for the Big Woods lots.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.