Laserfiche WebLink
> <br />>roviding for <br />5 approved by <br />approval . <br />>n Fee in the <br />iw and recording <br />:hereto in the <br />:y Council of <br />>ld, Hennepin <br />IS: <br />ighold, <br />1 no direct <br />ir joint ownership <br />le City of Orono with <br />3n or before <br />certified original <br />^pies of the <br />Ln. <br />if the plat has not <br />It, it will be <br />Orono for subdivision <br />rmesota at a regular <br />of_ _Ayes and <br />MINUTES OF TUB rUANMING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAV 4, 1981 <br />The Planning Coinmission met on above da^^The <br />following members were present: Chairma 7.40Jabbour.^McDonald Goetten and Aoams arrived at 7.40. <br />Mabusth represented the Cit^ start. <br />attendance <br />7:30 PM <br />, „ • u or-fiQfsnt Mabusth noted the certi”Richard Raiche was t affidavit of publication..ppu„- <br />tion. <br />RICHARD RAICHE <br />2901 Watertown <br />Subdivision <br />#603 <br />7:30-7:35 PM <br />crabbour was -'--f hrwoSld^re'ovrthe" <br />high «ater. subdivision approval and <br />^erroad^onl true ted along west edge of the Property. <br />Goetten motioned to approve the application subject <br />to the following conditions. <br />1) Private driveway to serve all three lots, no direct <br />access for Lot 1 to Watertown Rd. <br />ni o ^>yistinq road dov/n center of property. <br />=^e?^s^agreemLt Will be reg^ <br />ments not completed prior to rinax <br />3) City to acquire road and utilities easement o\er <br />driveway outlet. <br />4) All disturbed area to be seeded v;ithin 10 days of <br />grading completion. <br />5) Payment of park dedication tee in amount of $600.00 <br />$200.00 for each lot. <br />McDonald moved to second. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0) <br />Mr and Mrs. Strong were present. Mabusth^noted the <br />certificate of mailing and the affidavit <br />tion^ NO one was present in the audience to addres. <br />this application. <br />RUXTOM R. STRONG <br />420 So. Brown Rd. <br />Subdivision <br />609 <br />7:45-7:50 PM <br />Jabbour questioned the maximum width of the <br />driveway and hoped that a minimum of 14 ft. ^ <br />lot line could be maintained because of the prox - y <br />wet lands In reality, the road serves two lots <br />to the rear of the property and therefore could main <br />tain the standards of a private driveway. This ro <br />would never be used as a r°ad‘out <br />would recommend limiting .'^oo ftlot to 30 ft. with the normal cul de sac of 100 ft. <br />McDonald asked Strong to describe what <br />place the dav the site inspector made ^ <br />?ion. Strong stated that this was an attempt to <br />clear the drainfield lines, but that he <br />the site inspector on questions he had concerning the <br />existing septic system.