Laserfiche WebLink
::tor <br />luation Review <br />n of the <br />site, and <br />2 septic <br />rainfield <br />2rflow. <br />end marked <br />into the <br />sketched <br />hich will <br />lot while <br />lots. <br />le soils <br />sting house, <br />part of the <br />»y Gerald M. <br />.bed his <br />no actual <br />r and <br />just down <br />roposed <br />4PI, and <br />3 standard <br />an 75' <br />levation. <br />location <br />for a well <br />ot unworkable. <br />s a house <br />nfield site, <br />le. <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />Re: Donald C. Mogen, 1170 Lyman Avenue <br />April 12, 1983 <br />Page 2 <br />A number of deficiencies are noted in the proposed septic <br />system design: <br />Proposed <br />Required <br />2 tanks 1-900 gal 1-500 gal. <br />2 tanks 1-1000 gal min 1-750 gal min <br />Proposed <br />Required <br />915 s.f. drainfield <br />330 s.f. per bedroom or 990 s.f. for <br />a 3 bedroom home <br />Proposed "levelling" at drainfield site is questionable and <br />not advisable - drainfield site should remain undisturbed <br />and drop boxes should be used. <br />Finally, note that if a proposal for a specific house location <br />would encroach on the tested drainfield sites, further <br />testing would likely be required prior to approval of a <br />building permit. <br />mmmm ' ' . .