Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 11, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 9 of 25 <br /> <br />5. #15-3711 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CHAPTER 86 TO MODIFY SURVEY <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS – ORDINANCE <br />NO. 146 (continued) <br /> <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Walsh Opposed. <br /> <br />6. #15-3722 STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE <br /> <br />Senior Planner Gaffron stated at the April 27 meeting the Council provided some direction on this draft <br />ordinance regarding stormwater and drainage trunk fee. Staff did make the following changes pursuant to <br />that discussion: <br /> <br />1. Establishing a fee credit in the 2-acre and 5-acre zones for: <br /> <br /> Acreage of newly-created wetland. <br /> Acreage of stormwater ponding or similar improvements that provide additional treatment <br />benefits beyond what is required to treat the stormwater runoff from the development site. <br /> Acreage of conservation easements resulting from Conservation Design process in both the <br />2-acre and 5-acre zones. <br /> <br />2. The perimeter buffer credit for the 5-acre zone is removed. <br /> <br />3. The conversion to a per-lot fee basis for the 1/2 acre, 1-acre, 2-acre and 5-acre zones caps the fee <br /> at the zoning lot size dry-buildable minimum area. As a result, existing wetlands will no longer <br /> be included in the chargeable area and therefore no fee credit is given for the existing wetlands. <br /> <br />It should be noted that because the multi-family and high-density residential fees remain on a gross per- <br />acre basis, the following credits would still be allowed: <br /> <br /> All wetland acreage up to the delineation line. <br /> Acreage of stormwater ponding or similar improvements that provide additional <br />treatment benefits beyond what is required to treat the stormwater runoff from the <br />development site. <br /> Acreage of conservation easements resulting from the Conservation Design process. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the draft ordinance section for revising the Fee Schedule has been removed from the Fee <br />Ordinance and is attached as a separate Fee Schedule Ordinance for adoption. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted there is one correction on Exhibit A, the bottom of Page 3 under Item 7, relating to the <br />three characteristics for reduction. Gaffron stated those items should be underlined as well since it is new <br />language in the Code. The Council should review the draft and direct Staff as to any additional changes <br />desired. <br /> <br />Printup stated as it concerns redevelopment projects, he would be comfortable removing that and keeping <br />this ordinance specific to new development. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she is in agreement with Council Member Printup and that she is not prepared to <br />address redevelopment at this time but that it could be a later discussion. <br />Entire Council Packet 05/26/15 [Page 11 of 378]