My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
07-13-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 9:53:56 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 9:52:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Gaffron stated there is nothing like this proposed development currently in Orono and that the proposal is <br />showing virtually no common areas at this point other than the road. Gaffron stated the City Council <br />should determine whether the proposed density at 51 -units is appropriate, whether the roadway should be <br />private or public, and the general design and orientation of the dwelling units in relation to the minimal <br />lot sizes and setbacks. <br />Tom Gonyea, Applicant, stated they were in front of the Planning Commission a couple of weeks ago and <br />that their original plan was a 51- unit plan for approximately four units per acre. The feedback from the <br />Planning Commission at first was that it seemed like a lot of units. Gonyea indicated they have worked <br />with Staff to show what the current density would be at eight units per acre and then with 65 -foot lots and <br />standard setbacks of five and ten feet. Gonyea stated they wanted to put those options forward to see <br />which one the City Council would prefer. Gonyea noted the Planning Commission was not in favor of <br />higher density. <br />Gonyea indicated the color rendering on the overhead shows the 65 -foot lots. Gonyea stated there would <br />be some variation in lot size and house size. <br />Gonyea stated there is a project over in Plymouth that is a good example of what this product will look <br />like. <br />Gaffron displayed the development in Plymouth. Gaffron noted in this development there is 10 feet <br />between the homes. <br />Ian Peterson, David Weekly Homes, stated they will likely be the builder on the project and that he can <br />speak to the specifics of the product. Peterson stated the Plymouth property was a unique project from a <br />topography perspective. Peterson noted the site was actually zoned and guided for multi -family and that <br />they came up with 60 -foot lots and 10 feet in between the buildings. The neighborhood is different from <br />a typical suburban development in how they set back from the road and the traditional 3 -car garages. <br />Peterson indicated they also came up with three different garage variations, which helps break up the <br />streetscape. Peterson stated this layout allows a more traditional back yard, wider houses, and a shallow <br />back yard to allow for more of a family setting. <br />Peterson stated on the 50 -foot products, they make sure the house and the garage are on the same plane so <br />there is not a snub nosed garage where the garage is way out in front of the house, which allows for a <br />better visual. <br />Peterson stated on the 45 -foot wide lots, there would be ten feet between the buildings. Peterson stated <br />the 45 -foot lots limit the garage options and that these units would be a two -stall garage. If a third stall is <br />added, it would need to be tandem. Peterson stated from a streetscape perspective, the 45 -foot lots limit <br />what can be done in terms of the front fagade. Peterson stated to his recollection on a 45 -foot lot, the <br />home would be 35 feet wide and 75 feet deep. <br />Walsh asked what the typical square footage would be on this project and what the square footage was on <br />the Plymouth project. <br />Peterson indicated on the project across from Wayzata High School, the units ranged from 2,400 to 3,200 <br />square feet. The largest home was 3,700 square feet. Peterson noted the square footages do not include a <br />Page 20 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.