My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-10-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 9:52:36 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 9:51:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 10, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock pm. <br />7. #15-3763 CHRISTOPHER W. BOLLIS, 200-350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH — <br />PRELIMINA.RY PLAT (continued) <br />McMillan pointed out this is a managed wetland, which is a high quality, healthy wetland, which requires <br />a bigger buffer. McMillan stated there are not a lot of 75 -foot buffers that are required and that the City's <br />Code says 50 feet. McMillan stated the City could grant certain waivers for certain lots but still require <br />the 50 -foot buffers. McMillan stated in her view it is something the City should take very seriously and <br />that the Watershed District has analyzed every single wetland in the City and requires different <br />qualifications and classifications depending on the type of wetland it is. McMillan stated the City could <br />grant a variance to allow septic systems within the 75 -foot buffer. <br />Rusty Olson noted the buffer is there to prevent the wetland from runoff. The mound system will have <br />vegetation over it so there will not be runoff like a hard surface where there is 100 percent runoff towards <br />the wetland. <br />McMillan stated the wastewater would go straight down and not run into the wetland. McMillan stated a <br />variance would be one way of dealing with that situation. <br />McMillan asked if the City Council has any concerns about the landscape plan. McMillan stated she is <br />fine with it. <br />Printup indicated he is fine with it. <br />Walsh noted Outlot A has approximately 2,000 trees in it. <br />Bollis stated they are proposing 40 new development trees along with a total of 21 owner trees, which <br />would put them at a total of 61 developer trees. City Code only calls for 13.75 trees. Bollis stated they <br />chose to lay the trees out in a way that would buffer the homes more rather than simply along the <br />boulevard. <br />Walsh stated he would like to hear what the neighbors have to say about the trees. <br />Levang noted there are some trees along the road as well as along the lot lines. Levang asked if Outlot A <br />would look the same from the road. Levang stated it appears from the plan that Outlot A is bare along the <br />road, which is not correct. <br />Bollis stated Outlot A has quite a few trees and that there are trees that abut the road. <br />Levang stated she likes the trees along the lot lines to provide more privacy for the lots, which is <br />something the City has not required before. <br />Gaffron pointed out the existing cul-de-sac and the proposed extension of the road. <br />Bollis stated those trees would stay and that they will be avoiding the two clumps of trees. Bolus stated <br />his belief is that they will only lose 15 trees for the road and that there will be a net gain of 46 trees on the <br />whole development. <br />Levang asked if the trees are being positioned to protect the building sites. <br />Page 15 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.