My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-10-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 9:52:36 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 9:51:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 10, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock pm. <br />7. #15-3763 CHRISTOPHER W. BOLLIS, 200-350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH — <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT (continued) <br />Levang asked if Lots 1, 2, 3 and 7 would access off of Kintyre rather than the cul-de-sac. <br />Gaffron stated those would likely have driveways that do not enter into the cul-de-sac. <br />Bollis indicated that is correct. <br />McMillan asked if there are any issues with Outlot A by adding one or two driveways. <br />Gaffron stated there should not be any issues with adding more driveways <br />Walsh stated at the top of the cul-de-sac, there is some pretty narrow access, which raises concerns about <br />snow plowing. <br />Bollis stated to his understanding City Code allows for a minimum of 11 feet for driveway access. Lot S <br />has 30 some feet in width. Bollis stated in his view it is adequate width to put a driveway there. <br />Gaffron indicated the City does have similar situations in other areas. From a public road standpoint, this <br />would not be the ideal situation for maintenance and the City would prefer not to have driveways that are <br />all accessing onto a cul-de-sac. Gaffron stated with three driveways accessing off of the cul-de-sac, it is <br />probably not an issue. The cul-de-sac has a paved 80 -foot width and will need to be maintained all the <br />time in the event emergency vehicles require access. <br />Levang noted the Oliver Hill development is somewhat similar to this development. <br />McMillan stated the issue that is unresolved is the existing cul-de-sac and what should be done with it. <br />McMillan stated it is doubtful the City can arrive at a decision on that tonight. <br />Gaffron agreed that it is unresolved at this time and that he will be asking the engineers to review it. The <br />neighbors have indicated they prefer the cul-de-sac to remain. Staff has not made that decision since it <br />should be up to the developers and the property owners who are on that cul-de-sac. Gaffron stated in <br />other situations a portion of the road has been platted as an outlot. <br />Walsh noted the original development said that portion should be an easement and that it is now proposed <br />to be platted as an outlot. Walsh asked how that piece got platted as an outlot. <br />Gaffron stated that is what the first developer proposed and it was approved that way. Gaffron stated it <br />did not become an issue until this year. <br />Walsh stated without that a road cannot be built. <br />Mattick stated that area is owned by three different parties and that Mr. MacKinnon is working to obtain <br />the necessary signatures on the easement, which will then be recorded and will provide access. <br />Printup asked if there is anywhere else in the City where there is a cul-de-sac in the middle of a road. <br />Page 12 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.