Laserfiche WebLink
riance <br />cil 8/24/81 <br />t cannot be <br />tes the parcels <br />Lots 3 & 4, <br />ssory struc- <br />to sewer but <br />home is con- <br />occupied at <br />i green house <br />ihouse is an <br />The neighbor <br />2ity should <br />located <br />could be placed <br />m <br />«1 <br />5 4' <br />m <br />¥ <br />Fc ^ <br />4: <br />k <br />1^ ■ <br />':'T.1^.Lit LM .'t•iv-;rr^i <br />75* from the lakeshore* the setback variance would not be necessary <br />because the lot is 10* wider at that width. The new home must meet <br />a 160* average lakeshore setback line. <br />Please review the Planning Commission minutes of August 3, 1981 and <br />Council minutes of August 24, 1981. <br />Staff Recommendations <br />To recommend approval of the lot area, lot width and side setback <br />renewal variance application of Charles Hommeyer based on the followinq <br />findings: <br />1 -Findings <br />a) Residential unit has existed on property for over <br />50 years - SAC charge already paid. <br />b) Most affected neighbor has submitted written <br />approval of setback variance <br />c) Lots 1 & 2, Block 6 (Tom Williams) approved as a <br />buildable site in 1979. <br />d) Applicant has approximately 12,504 sf in lot area <br />that cannot be credited in application. <br />Average lakeshore setback line at 160* <br />Narrowness of lot to the rear/street of the property <br />Approval is subject to the following conditions: <br />2.Conditions <br />a) New house must be connected to sewer <br />b) Existing structures removed prior to issuance of <br />building permit. <br />t ■ <br />% <br />':. <br />. . .1 <br />.i <br />.a. <br />:§ <br />r-mmC- 1233 <br />DCPARTI <br />A-609 < <br />MINNEAl <br />LIST SIZE. <br />FEE OWNI <br />i;.i <br />Is I AMT\ <br />.es i AVM HO <br />l-JE__MAxSi <br />\S g. LtJiLi <br />XgS tjJ. MPA' <br />liwO P- AIAI2 <br />Z, tbMLX <br />X. AhiV^ <br />■4]