My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-1984 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1984
>
11-19-1984 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2023 3:27:38 PM
Creation date
7/6/2023 3:25:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
li <br />■ x:^^: <br />Wl <br />-I ■ <br />t <br />1950 Heritage Drive <br />Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 <br />November 15, 1984 <br />Orono Council <br />Orono City Hall <br />1335 Brown Road South <br />Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 <br />SUBJECT: Proposed Bed and Breakfast Business <br />1900 Shoreline Drive (“The Kaul House”) <br />Dear Members of the Council: <br />I am in receipt of various documents pertaining to the above <br />named proposal being made by Tom and Kristi Kaul. The pur <br />pose of this letter is to formally respond to this proposal. <br />STATEMENT: ^ owners of property located at 1950 Heritage. <br />iHy atid _! are commit ed in our opposition to this proposal. <br />While we would gladly consider any "new" facts as well as <br />attempts by the Kauls to meet any specific concerns we might <br />have regarding details of renovation or operation, our opp <br />osition centers on the principle of the proposal. <br />DISCUSSION: So that the Council and the Kauls have the <br />opportunity to understand the nature of our opposition, wo <br />list below several issues that are important to us: <br />1. Wo purchased our property in reliance of Orono's zoning <br />laws as they govern our neighborhood and the protection they <br />provide over our property values. In accordance with this <br />reliance, we undertook a two yea’' project to make substan*-ial <br />improvements to our property. (For the same reason v/o also op <br />posed the request by the Andersons to sub-divide t.neir property <br />creating a sub-standard lot). <br />In granting the Kaul proposal, the Council would clearly <br />be submitting other property owners to the risk of lower <br />property values. It is inconceivable that a ^t,B" would <br />have anything other than a negative impact on the value of <br />other properties. This is simply a risk we should not be <br />asked to take. <br />more
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.