My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-1984 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1984
>
11-19-1984 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2023 3:27:38 PM
Creation date
7/6/2023 3:25:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
pauo i <br />Duunc Harth and Mrs. D. Johnstone <br />1810 .''hadywood Koaci - Variance <br />1. A variamre to side sotbacK for the existing house would oe <br />necessary (perhaps a lot lino rearrangeinent coolti be dictated here). <br />2. Although the lot was assessed footage for sewer, city maps <br />indicate no stu5i was ever placed and the plant charge never paid. <br />3. The lot areas proposed are signif icantly less than the average lot <br />area in the noigliborhood. <br />Note that if tnis applicition is approved, it .may set a prec«?dent by <br />allowing a common v).35 acre lot to be declared buildablo, hence a <br />cursory rev iew of the i.R - 1C d i sl."T ii: t i nd icates a pocen11 a I of as many as <br />10 or 15 new building sites might be created from existing common <br />ownership lots that couldn't be ouilt on if required to more closely <br />.mee t the 1/2 ac r e r eq u i r eme n t. <br />A recommendation of .iporoval of Lot 21 as a separate building site might <br />include the following findi'igs: <br />1. The proposal can meet all hardcover requirements of the- I.R-IC <br />Zoning district. <br />2. All setbat'k requirements for tile m-w lot can oe .met. <br />3. From the t-ix record it appears that the lot has been valued an>) <br />assessetl as n separate lot, nof incrementaIly as part of the adjacent <br />property. <br />4. The applicant has owned the property since before the current <br />zoning went into effect. <br />5. The property has been assessed for stwer. <br />6. The lot area is consistent with many other properties in the <br />neighborhoovl and is etiuivalent to or larger than 11 of 25 lots in the <br />neighoorhood. <br />vTonlitions of approv.il would include: <br />1. Granting a v.aclance to tiio setbacks for the existing house. <br />2. No other p<»c for.m.nice stand.ntl setbacks allowed for either lot i.e. <br />both mast meet all hardcov.‘c an<l selba-,’k requirements. <br />3. Payment of park fee for new lot in the .Jimount of $430. <br />4. $225 plant charge to be paid with building permit along with <br />st.nid.ird SAC charges, etc. <br />5. Applicant to bear the expense of br inging sewer to the property if <br />no stub exists. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.