My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-1984 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1984
>
08-20-1984 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2023 9:01:04 AM
Creation date
7/6/2023 8:55:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f*, ..'.•• •• ••• •'■•••»•••■*•■•.••/•'•••• <br />*• V. * <br />;•••.■’••••f > ; • •! ; .'• 1 I <br />■ 4:*. . <br />.••/••.f-.v;*.■•i^ <br />^'«yvi:OT <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Planning CommissionMichael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />August 10» 1984 <br />#854 G. Robert Johnson, <br />Conditional use Permit <br />1981 Fagerness Point Road <br />After-the-fact <br />Application - Conditional Use Permit to construct retaining walls <br />within 75* of the lakeshore <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />List of Property Owners <br />Survey Submitted <br />Plans Submitted <br />This is an after-the-fact application to place ffta^^i"? <br />("olanters" according to the applicant) and steps within 75 of the <br />iakesSo^! Th^walls and steps are in place now and were constructed <br />without City review or permits. <br />A short synopsis of this project follows: The City issued a <br />101.4 feet of rip-rapping 1983^ TheDredaina Company for this address on September 22, 1983. ine <br />application noted only 30* would be rip rapped at this time, no time <br />frame stated for completion of the rest. <br />Early this summer staff was notified by a Planning <br />the aooarent violations of tree cutting within 75* of the laxe ana <br />construction otretaining walls. Staff • s subsequent investigation <br />revealed 2-24"+ stumps which appeared to be y5-2" <br />cut must have been dead trees. No stumps greater than 1/2 2 <br />diameter were apparent on the slope. Thelarger trees were cut and stumps removed at the crest of the hill. Tne <br />ownir states that only small brush was removed from the J <br />to "see what was there". As of today there appears to be roughly 50 <br />percent cover again established over the slope. There is no evidence <br />of erosion of the slope occurring. <br />Retaining walls ("planters") and steps had also been constructed. <br />The owner stated that he had been told by his contractors that all <br />required permits had been obtained, ^h® retaining walls are located <br />on the approximate center of the shoreline, made of 6 timbers, <br />would estimate the hardcover at about 250 sf including steps and tops of <br />nianter timbers, or about 3 percent in the 0-75 zone.planter timbers, or about 3 percent in the 0-75 <br />The steps are obviously necessary in order to have access 1 <br />Note however that this property also has a large dock southeast of <br />Fagerness Point Road with relatively level lake access. <br />No evilareneconstipercer <br />seems• <br />of the <br />has gi <br />and to <br />plants <br />others <br />reteni <br />saturc <br />The Ci <br />the o^ <br />repori <br />The rd <br />erosi< <br />was dc <br />Staff <br />stabi; <br />recomi <br />reviei
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.