My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1984 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984 Planning Packets
>
05-21-1984 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2023 4:15:13 PM
Creation date
6/28/2023 4:12:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Planning Commission <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />May 16, 1984 <br />SUBJECT: #819 William Mills, 200 Leaf Street - Subdivision <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Current Survey <br />This application was tabled at your March 19 meeting pending receipt o^ <br />septic testing information. As a result of subsequent testing? <br />applicant has submitted a revised survey, changing the boundary to <br />accommodate an alternate drainfield site for the existing house. <br />Upon my site inspection, I found that the drainfield serving the <br />existing house IS failing miserably and discharging to the surface, <br />1 pond. This system was last inspected in Fall <br />JL982 and at that time the system was functioning adequately and was <br />believed to be no closer than 30* to the pond. It is obvious now that a <br />drainfield line extends to within 8' of the pond. This system must be <br />totally replaced and must conform to code. <br />an add^itional problem—although an alternate <br />^ this house was tested as required, this site will <br />futuxr^ use*^*^^ immediately, leaving no further alternate location for <br />marginal sites requiring innovative drainfield construction. The <br />existing house is quite suitable for a mound <br />ml require extensive curtain drainage for a trench <br />system to function adequately. Both sites for the new lot have slopes <br />percent and with high water tables, which would also <br />svsi^imc order to allow standard trench <br />lim ^ modified shallow trench system at these sites would <br />"If3or loamy sand and loam fill layers be added to create a <br />maio?na?l imported, and which is <br />slopes. A mound system on these slopes <br />would require unusually great amounts of sand. These will be costly <br />systems regardless of which is finally used. cosriy <br />consistent, we must ask that additional testing be <br />completed, and if necessary lines rearranged again, to create an <br />iii^ediately!*^"*^®^*’ m addition to the one which will be used <br />Other considerations for this project include: <br />1. Lot 1 granting a driveway easement in favor of Lot 2.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.