Laserfiche WebLink
Units <br />5 acre <br />not been <br />t must <br />5 ease- <br />ait] . <br />sre is <br />Leant has <br />Lans to <br />al descrip- <br />pad. I <br />L ground <br />ring owner- <br />attached <br />■ please <br />lo limit on <br />this PRD of <br />lood of <br />>reserve <br />interact <br />! visual/ <br />irovide <br />er recrea- <br />ng the <br />cts would <br />values? <br />rtify that <br />back area <br />ved. A <br />on the <br />n so that <br />\W: <br />i <br />i ^ <br />7 <br />I.: ‘ <br />.’=V <br />I <br />i <br />■ <br />*4# <br />.. / • . . ,, <br />M •• •• <br />Planning Commission <br />March 15, 1984 <br />page 2 <br />Staff review of hardcover data 0 - 250* <br />Setback Area Hardcover Allowed <br />O’- 75' = 16,200 sf <br />75'-250* = 37,800 sf 9,450 sf or 25% <br />Proposed <br />0 <br />22,000 sf or 58% <br />I am not certain that I have interpreted the 250' setback data <br />but it would appear from the enclosed staff sketch that 58% <br />hardcover appears faj.rly accurate. <br />Questions for consideration: <br />a) Would you approve a nine unit PRD if all hardcover <br />standards are satisfied? <br />b) Would you prefer a PRD of two quads and one unit, <br />three duplex and one triplex, three triplex units? <br />c) Would you prefer a nine lot plat? <br />JAM;j1