02-21-1984 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

cTrn Ck 80' '•ir' ^ > *« . • ‘ •» • ';>a r' ■"»•«■ r. ^ ^ ’ ■» TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator February 16, 1984 Rezoning of North Shore Drive Marina List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Property Owners List Exhibit B — Plat Map Exhibit C - Plat Map Designating Notification Zone Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Millard Letter Exhibit F - Norum Letter Exhibit G - Lyman Letter Exhibit H - Council Minutes - February 9, 1984 Background Information on Current Rezoning Application Prior to the first City wide zoning in 1967, the property was used as a commercial marina and prior to that use, the property contained a small lakeshore resort. In 1967, the property was rezoned from Commercial to LR-lc-1. The City was sued thereafter by North Shore Drive Marina and lost the suit. The City’s actions were deemed arbitrary and capricious and the courts ordered the City to rezone the subiect property back to B-2. In 1974, the City once again rezoned the North Shore Drive Marina to LR-lC-1. The City's reasons for rezoning were founded in specific directives in the Comprehensive Plan, claims that access to site were dangerous for vehicular use, increased commercial use would intensify that traffic hazard and marina is surrounded by residential properties, in 1975, North Shore Drive Marina filed a lawsuit co*^testing the rezoning but nothing has been done by the plaintiff since the filing. ^ winter. North Shore filed a building permit application with order to build a repair shop 72' X 40'. The new structure will house the entire repair operation and the storage of all boats to be repaired. The applicant has provided a revised site plan locating all existing structures and the proposed repair shop. (Exhibit D) The new structure will be located 15' from the residentially zoned/used lot line. LR-lC-1 standards do not contain setbacks for commercially used buildings. The B-2 zone requires a 50' setback from residentially used lot lines. The applicant seeks a setback variance. Mr. Hork has been asked to delay on the setback application until the rezoning matter IS resolved. North Sh< February Page 2 Based on expansioi use is n< to resold plans fo] Conserval in the pi marina tc The City Shore Drj Council's At their Commissic property, be set aj B-2 zonir noted the in betwee rezoning an appro\ Staff Recc to approve B-2 and aj in betweer applicant Approval o on the fol 1. Suppoi 2. Rezoni use of Rezoni but pe The pr of the of the in the