Laserfiche WebLink
5^ <br />b <br />3 <br />TO: <br />DATl’: <br />W. U. I'onson, City Ailninistmtor <br />A. P. nison. Asst. Zoninj^ Acbiinistrator <br />October 2f^, 1076 <br />SURTI-CT:barren Ortcnblad - 270^^ Casco Point f'oncl <br />\’ariance - lot V.'idth, Side Setback, I.akeshore SetijacI; <br />Conpared to Adjoininr Dvv’ellinp.s <br />Mr. Ortenblad is requesting, variances Tor constniction of a nc’v dwelling on tliis <br />lot whidi oresently contains a vacant cottaqe. Tlie proposed heme is single story <br />with a walkout basement on tlic lake side. T!ie lot is 60' wide by approximately <br />393' deep. Lot area slightly exceeds the ininimum 1/2 acre requirement. <br />Tlie proposal shows a 4^' ivide build inf with a 10' north side setback and a 6' south <br />side setback (10' ninininr. is required). Hie liouse is staked on site and shown on <br />the survey to be located approximateIv 10' closer to the lake than the south neiph- <br />bor and 15'-20' closer to the lake than the north nciphbor. ’k>th ailjaccnt neighbors <br />hav^e called the staff to voice concern over the location of the buildinf as regards <br />side setbacks and positioning ahead of their hones. <br />I see no problem with the lot w’idth setback as nev construction here would eliminate <br />the old vacant cal)in; however, 1 question t)io neei! for any other variances on new <br />constniction. <br />Variances: Lot '‘-idtis • 40', 40« <br />Side 4»^ 403 <br />34.201 - construction not permitted to extend closer to the lalvC tiian the adjacent <br />buildings. <br />PLANNING Om^lISSION MHETING - Novenfcer 15, 1976 <br />Suggested applicant submit revised plans which would meet required side yard setback <br />with a lakeshore setback that would meet the average setback of the dwellings <br />located on the lots on either side of this subject property. Neighbors on either <br />side of this property objected to variances. <br />STAFF - November 24, 1976 <br />No new proposal has been submitted as of today. <br />* <br />i