Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Stcvf ■•.allaok fo/^ntion) <br />Sixtli Awiuio 'i. <br />if jiiilHUvision <br />Page 2 f r » 7 f.4’ <br />PLWINC C0r?’ISSI«K - October 4, 1076 it <br />A Public '.Icnring was schcdiilcil for .\ovcnber 1, 1976 at 7:30 n.n. <br />PLAYJT'JO CO'l^'TSSION ».tIT:TTN ’C - k^ovenber 1, 1976 <br />Oiitc a few ailjoining neighbors apnenred for the T^iblic {’earing. Several stated their <br />p[)sition on the proposal ~ sot^o objected . Hie Planning ConFiission ta/jled this natter <br />and requested tlie follo'N'ing adt^itional infomation: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Re\riew l)v v’atershed nistrict or lleancpin County Conservation district to detemine <br />actual wetlands designation in relation to tiiose s{iot\m on developer s tooog. <br />Pevie'.' by appropriate agenc''^ as to flood plain st.atus of subject pronerty anc. \%.iat <br />effect it night have on proposed su;>division. <br />Peview bv liennepin County Public V.brbs Pcpartiicnt with regard to proposed rerouting <br />of ^oiintv ro«iLh>ravs and cffoct su!>division nifiht have on any sucli fiicurc pltips. <br />STAFF - N’ovenbor 2, 1976 <br />I contacted .Icnnepin County l\iblic ’’or’KS ’Vpartnent regarding roaih.*ays and sent then n <br />copy of tlie plans. <br />I talked to IjVlc !^v;anson, called Ilickock f .Associates and .iennopin County Conservation <br />District licforc learning Conscrx ’ation District would review* \;ctlands status. .^*nt copy <br />of plans. <br />Called munerous agencies before Icaminn designated f]oo(| plain areas have no legal <br />bearing on properties because of conflicting opinions. Jew flood plain nans are nw <br />being drawn In* '.arr ’ngincering. Valked to I,eii wraner a!)out nro{)lcn - nssurcil no ne <br />would revieiv' and send ne a report. <br />Ia <br />'t <br />t i. <br />f <br />I <br />I <br />*1 <br />TIMlIlll MlftfUnlir