My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
06-20-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2023 10:57:19 AM
Creation date
6/21/2023 8:57:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA23-000025 <br />20 June 2023 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Section 78-395 — Setbacks: <br />RR -1A / PRD <br />Required per PRD <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Front <br />50' <br />142' home <br />72' detached garage <br />Rear <br />50' <br />177' home <br />No change <br />West Side <br />30' <br />135' home <br />63' detached garage <br />East Side <br />30' <br />68.1' home <br />183' detached garage <br />The lot area of 2.6 acres is conforming within the PRD as the outlot open spaces make up the <br />difference between the RR -1A district requirements and the approved lot sizes from a density <br />standpoint. The property exceeds 1.99 acres therefore there is no structural coverage limitation. <br />RR -1A Required Lot Area PRD Established Lot Area <br />217,800 square feet / 5 acres 114,112 square feet /2.6 acre <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Variance to Permit an CAB Streetward of the Princiaal Building (City Code Section 78-1440) <br />Section 78-1440 states that within RR -1A and RR -113 districts, an accessory building less than 1,000 <br />square feet may be located streetward of the principal building provided principal building setbacks <br />are met; and the accessory building is consistent in design, color and exterior material with the <br />principal building. <br />The applicant is prosing to locate the detached garage approximately 71 feet closer to the front lot <br />line than the home on the property. <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br />property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such <br />actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic <br />considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are <br />not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be <br />granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in <br />harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is <br />not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. <br />Construction of an accessory building is consistent with the intent of the Ordinance. <br />However, the size of the building proposed in the location proposed does not meet the <br />intent of the Ordinance. The applicant has alternative solutions and has not demonstrated <br />that their request is in harmony with the Ordinance. This criterion is not met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.