My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
06-20-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2023 10:57:19 AM
Creation date
6/21/2023 8:57:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 05/11/2023 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/19/2023 <br />60 -Day Review Period Expires: 07/182023 <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members <br />Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br />Natalie Nye, Planner <br />June 20, 2023 <br />\�kESHO <br />#LA23-000022, Michael Clark, 565 Leaf Street, Variance for Accessory Structure Location <br />Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a new accessory building <br />streetward of the principal building. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. <br />Background <br />The applicant is proposing to construct a new accessory building streetward of the principal building. The <br />proposed building will be used as a garage with an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on the second floor. The <br />garage will be constructed on the property between the principal building and the street, which is not <br />permitted in the LR -1A zoning district. The applicant is requesting a variance in order to construct the new <br />accessory building streetward of the principal building. All other building setbacks, hardcover, and lot <br />coverage requirements are met. <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the placement of the existing home on the <br />property as a practical difficulty. The existing home is situated at the rear of the property. A new accessory <br />building could not be constructed behind the home and therefore the applicant is requesting a variance to <br />allow the construction of the accessory building streetward of the home. Additionally, there are <br />topographical limitations that do not allow for the expansion of the existing attached garage. <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment. The existing home <br />is placed on the rear portion of the lot, 340 feet from the street, which limits the ability to construct an <br />accessory structure in a compliant location. Staff believes the placement of the home and the <br />topographical challenges that limit the expansion of the existing attached garage are practical difficulties <br />supporting the variance request. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Section 78-330 — Accessory Building Setbacks: <br />LR -1A District Accessory Building < 1,000 s.f. <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Front/Street <br />50' <br />168' <br />Rear <br />15' <br />252' <br />North Side <br />15' <br />15.2' <br />South Side <br />30' <br />126' <br />*Accessory buildings may not be located streetward of the principal building. <br />Section 78-350 — Lot Area/Width: <br />LR -1A District <br />Lot Area <br />Lot Width <br />Required <br />87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) <br />200' <br />Actual <br />87,123 s.f. (2.0 acre) <br />200' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.