Laserfiche WebLink
, ^r � <br /> Carter Delaittre � <br /> � February 19, 1991 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> In reviewing the staff inemos and Planning Commission/Council <br /> minutes, I think you will find that Smedberg was less than <br /> cooperative in allowing the subdivision to be completed. While <br /> neither Planning Commission nor Council objected to the division, <br /> Smedberg requested and was granted a tab 1 ing of the request f or 6 <br /> months so he could "research his options" for use of his. <br /> property. This attitude resulted from one caveat of the <br /> subdivision resolution which would require tax combination of all <br /> the parcels within each individual record lot. The application <br /> was tabled on March 25, 1985 and has never been rescheduled for <br /> action. Apparently, Nelson and McCloud were able to close on <br /> their transaction absent City subdivision approval, and none of <br /> the involved parties have pushed for completion of this <br /> application since that time. <br /> I should note that Mr. McCloud did return executed <br /> "automatic lot area variance" resolutions to my office on July � <br /> 26, 1985. Because the subdivision has never been finalized, the <br /> automatic lot area variance forms have never been finalized, <br /> which means that technically no permits can be issued for this <br /> property until a lot area variance is granted and the subdivision <br /> is resolved. <br /> My recommendation to you is as follows: <br /> l. As part of your after-the-fact variance request, you <br /> should request City approval of the automatic lot area <br /> variance resolution, which action was stalled out in 1985. <br /> '2. Mr. McCloud and the current owner of Record Lot 16 <br /> should jointly request reopening of the tabled subdivision <br /> application #889, to be reviewed concurrently with the <br /> variance request. For the record, Record Lot 16 al so has <br /> never been granted the automatic lot area variance. <br /> Also, be aware that Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, ' <br /> Subdivision 6 (B) disallows issuance of building permits until <br /> the lots have been legally combined for tax purposes. Further, <br /> Section 10.31, Subdivision 12 (D) requires that all seasonal <br /> dwel lings over 800 s.f. of f loor area be provided with a fully <br /> conforming on-site sewage treatment system. Issuance of an <br /> after-the-fact permit for the room additions will be predicated <br /> on these requirements being met. <br />