Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> HELD JANUARY i9, 1993 <br /> ZONING FILE #1627 - CONT. <br /> Rowlette felt they shouldab�ecl�sion the �pportunity to review the <br /> property prior to mak ( ng <br /> Cohen stated he W� 75 ' zone ,aand agre d welth Rowlette thatCthey <br /> instailed within the <br /> should be allowed to inspect the property. <br /> Chair Bellows indicated the ndap°onlbysa basCe�sed engineerAeShe <br /> opinion , not a s ( gned recomme <br /> felt if this were approved they would be aliowing a potential for <br /> the decks to be rebuilt � ousheandtshe . feht that shouadCbeareduced <br /> to the residence is enorm , <br /> to meet the 75 ' setback . <br /> Anderson stated his client would not obJect to reducfng the size <br /> of the attached deck . <br /> Cha i r Be 1 I ows suggested tthe Ifo I I oweng pp i)+ thef eng 1 nee ri ng totbe <br /> app I i cant tri me to comp l ete <br /> 2 ) <br /> done properly, including modification of the retaining walls ; <br /> revise the pians so that any flat area remaining is not wider than <br /> 3 ' ; 3 ) deck attached to cabi � toob� �onseofdretaaningtwa� { snneeded <br /> the 0-75 ' setback area; and ) P <br /> to support decks to be removed . <br /> Johnson asked how much of thehoWt muchgwas, Ibulylt QtoW supportaithe <br /> to reta( n the slope versus <br /> deck ( ng . He supported the Idea of retaining the slopes that fel <br /> in from the storm. <br /> Anderson stated he could not answer that question . <br /> It was moved by Cohen , seconded by Schroeder , to table Appllcat (on <br /> #1 627 for Samue I A. McC I oud , B � groposal and rsubm i t2 anyt add i t wona i <br /> appl ican t t i m e t o r e v i s e h i P <br /> required documents. Ayes 5 , nays 0. <br /> Cha i r Be I I ows recommended thei o�Pp �o v ins 1 t the prope(rtyproposa I i n <br /> time for the Planning Commiss <br /> 2 <br />