Laserfiche WebLink
Orono Fire Needs Assessment <br />51 | Page <br /> <br />overall service to Orono residents and reduce inefficiencies in emergency response. In <br />addition, the department and its members will have access to the rest of the Orono staff <br />and the administrative support services it can provide. <br />• Disadvantages (Cons). A key disadvantage to this COA is that the investment in capital is <br />too low to sustain the fleet and meet NFPA standards. This COA does not establish nor <br />realize and improvement in emergency response. The response is likely to remain at a Rural <br />level in our increasingly suburban and urban community. Further in this COA with its cost <br />distribution formula Orono residents disproportionately resource the department. This <br />COA is dependent on both Orono and Long Lake coming to a mutually agreeable agreement <br />on the transfer of the department which has so far, since 2017 been unsuccessful. <br /> <br />6.2 COA 2: Taxable Fire District/Joint Powers Agreement <br />• Description. This COA looks at Orono joining a future Fire District or JPA Department. It <br />uses a conceptual district from a Future Fire Services Meeting Presentation. That <br />conceptual district includes the cities of Corcoran, Greenfield, Independence, Long Lake, <br />Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach, Orono, Wayzata, and Woodland. It also <br />includes the current fire departments of Long Lake, Loretto/Hammel, Maple Plain and <br />Wayzata. This COA uses an Ad Valorum (property Value) tax formula for distribution of <br />costs. <br />• Cost. To estimate a cost for this COA the current operating budgets of the subject <br />departments were combined. In addition, it was assumed the capital needs of all the <br />departments was about the same as LLFDs so a sustainable capital need was calculated. <br />The costs were then distributed based on the subject communities’ tax capacities. Based <br />on these calculations the annual cost to Orono would be $1,910,000. The average cost to <br />Orono households would be $597 per year. Moving to a Duty Crews staffing structure <br />would likely raise that cost to $2,759,000 or an average of $725 per Orono household. <br />• Advantages (pros). Advantages of this COA would be possible capital cost avoidance in the <br />future and a larger pool of fire fighters to draw from which might offset recruiting and <br />retention trends. <br />• Disadvantages (Cons). Cost burden disproportionate to services provided. Using current <br />call volumes of the fire departments and cities included in the district, Orono would only <br />use approximately 22% of the service but fund 34% of the budget. As one of 10 <br />municipalities Orono would have very little local control. Improvements in service <br />standards, capital investment and operations would require agreement between the cities <br />served or worse yet convincing an independent board. <br /> <br /> <br />